viernes, 25 de junio de 2010

Take Our Jobs! Immigrant workers open their arms and their jobs to the authorized labor force in the U.S.




Summer job, anyone? Anyone? ANYONE?!? Thought so.

You could always argue that people authorized to work in the U.S. won't take the jobs because they are paid at very low wages, working conditions are poor, etc.

If you want to
pay 6 dollars for an avocado, though, you can keep up with your arguments. I know it's not an ideal situation, far from it. But the farming industry is already quite subsidized by the government and it needs to be competitive enough to flood Mexico's market with corn and beans, so we can't really raise wages back home.

Plus, what would happen to the restaurant industry (remember, our economy as a nation and in California is largely service-based)?. If the cost of food goes up for businesses, they will serve their meals at higher prices and pay their workers even less than they already do. Basically, low-wage labor protects what we have left of certain job markets.

I'm no economist, I could be wrong. Please point stuff out to me. I'm just writing about what I've read and talked to people about.

And even if it was well-paid, let's say, $15-$20 an hour (remember, this is "unskilled" labor), do you think authorized workers would flock to California's hot Central Valley and pick strawberries for 13 hours a day? Not so sure. Maybe.
Who knows.

I just want to show that the issue is more complicated than it may seem, and that low-wage labor in the agricultural sector can be and is good for the people of the U.S. Let's not make this into an anti-immigrant issue, because all these people are doing is a job most Americans would scorn. It's not easy to change things, we live in a capitalist system. If all the migrant workers left, what would happen to our economy, and the other jobs we do, that we are trying to keep? One business falls, and the rest will follow.

Think of it as a food chain. Migrant labor is at the bottom, but without it, the rest of us would be in danger.

If interested, however, go to http://www.takeourjobs.org/ to fill out an application.

miércoles, 27 de enero de 2010

Fotoperiodismo de verdad

Recomiendo que lean esta entrevista con el fotógrafo hatiano Daniel Morel (está en inglés). También miren sus fotos del primer día después del terremoto el 12 de enero del 2010.

I recommend reading the following interview by Haitian photographer Daniel Morel. Some of his photos of the aftermath of the earthquake in Port-au-Prince on January 12, 2010 can also be seen.

http://lens.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/01/27/showcase-117/

He brings up the following issues:

-photojournalism focused on what is happening on the ground, giving people's voices an outlet (that's what the field should be focused on, right?)

-international journalists coming in to do "show business" journalism

-the way in which documenting what has happened instead of lending a hand, for example, can also be of big help (I am conflicted with this point, since my instincts would be to help first, shoot later, although there may never be a moment to focus on either thing fully. When does a photographer cross a line? Are photojournalists treated with more leniency for inserting themselves in other people's lives?

jueves, 14 de enero de 2010

I feel like an imposter

lying to myself in the face.

Slowly buying into,

then running away from

a consumerist lifestyle.

"¡Rebajas¡ !TODO a -50%¡" anuncian las vidrieras.

Rebajas. Al fin compro ropa linda más que una sola vez al año, y lo hago a muerte.

A muerte.

Ojala hubieran rebajas al -50% de la muerte.

Haiti.

Now when I punch those digits, "swipe" that card, it will be for you.

All those days swipin' and swipin'. In the back--no, forefront of my head, thinking:

"This is false, this is a front.

Clothes don't matter, don't change much.

I could be spending my money in so many different

useful

realistic

and human ways."

Clothes fall apart, but not as fast as lives do.

Haiti, this swipe's for you.

domingo, 3 de enero de 2010

Galeano, sin vos este mundo no tendría tanto brillo...

En una entrevista con el diario español Público, Galeano describe lo que le parece Obama:

"Uno de mis maestros, don Carlos Quijano, solía decir: “Todos los pecados tienen redención. Todos menos uno. Es imperdonable pecar contra la esperanza”. Con el tiempo aprendí cuánta razón tenía. Lamentablemente, Obama está pecando contra la esperanza que él mismo supo despertar, en su país y en el mundo. Aumentó los gastos de guerra, que ahora devoran la mitad de su presupuesto. ¿Defensa contra quién, en un país invadido por nadie, que ha invadido y sigue invadiendo a casi todos los demás? Y, para colmo, ese chiste de mal gusto de recibir el Nobel de la Paz pronunciando un elogio de la guerra."

Exactamente. Gracias por decirlo. Que la gente se de cuenta que no es más que otra marioneta en la lista de los que les toca "gobernar" para mantener el poder criminal de los EEUU. Al Qaeda puede ser una amenaza muy real (no me lo creo al 100% porque los medios de comunicación nos engañaron antes y lo seguiran haciendo), pero no saben qué hacer con este lío gordo en el que nos metieron a todos.

Acá se encuentra la entrevista entera:

http://www.publico.es/internacional/282576/america/latina/exorcizando/cultura/dela/impotencia